Knowledge Hub · Women endurance athletes
Training after 40: what changes for women endurance athletes
More women are running, riding, swimming and racing triathlon well into their forties, fifties and beyond. Yet for a long time, the research that shaped how endurance athletes train was built mostly on younger people, and often on men. Researchers have called women in midlife and beyond close to invisible in sport and exercise science (McNulty et al., 2024). That is starting to change, and what we are learning is mostly good news.

What the research says about the engine
A 2026 scoping review from the University of Calgary gathered four decades of research on women masters athletes, meaning women aged 40 and over who compete in endurance sport (Vangsgaard et al., 2026). Across 29 studies, aerobic capacity declined a little each year, with reported losses of roughly half a percent to a little over two percent per year. Most of that change was linked to the heart pumping a bit less blood with each minute of work, followed by changes in body composition.
Two findings matter most for how we train. First, training volume predicted aerobic capacity. The women who kept training more held on to more of their fitness. Age changes the starting point, but consistent training still shapes where you land. Second, the picture below the top end looked steadier. Lactate threshold, as a share of aerobic capacity, generally rose with age, and peak lactate stayed stable. In plain terms, the ceiling may come down slowly while the ability to work close to that ceiling holds up well. Economy, or how much energy it costs to move at a given speed, tended to get a little more expensive with age, although the findings there were mixed.
The review was also honest about what we do not know. The effect of menopause on these markers was unclear. The authors called for longer studies that follow the same women over time. So we treat menopause as an important part of each athlete's story, not as a reason to apply a fixed formula.
Strength becomes more valuable, not less
Muscle and strength change with age, and that affects economy, durability and how well you hold form late in a race. The encouraging part is how well women respond to lifting at every age. A 2026 meta-analysis pooled 126 studies of more than 4,000 women and found that resistance training improved strength and body composition in both premenopausal and postmenopausal women, with no meaningful difference between the groups (Isenmann et al., 2026). The authors concluded that it is never too late to start, and that individualization matters more than strict rules based on age or menopausal status.
For endurance performance specifically, a systematic review of 26 studies in trained endurance athletes found that adding strength training improved economy, muscle power and time trial performance (Beattie et al., 2014). That is why strength sits inside the plan, two times a week, rather than being an extra that gets dropped when life gets busy.

Recovery and protein
Recovery can shift with age too, though perhaps not in the way many athletes expect. In a small study of well trained cyclists, masters riders recovered their physical performance after hard intervals at a similar rate to younger riders. What lagged was how they felt. Two days later, the masters cyclists still reported more fatigue, more soreness and lower motivation (Borges et al., 2018). The authors suggested that this slower sense of recovery could affect whether people stay with training over the long term.
In masters triathletes, muscle protein synthesis over three days of hard training was lower than in younger triathletes, and cycling performance soon after a muscle damaging run tended to recover more slowly (Doering et al., 2016). Protein is one practical lever here. A large meta-analysis found that protein supplementation increased the strength and muscle gains from resistance training, while also noting that the effect became smaller with age, which points to steady, adequate daily protein rather than a single magic dose (Morton et al., 2018).
These recovery studies were small and not specific to women, so we hold them lightly. They still point in a useful direction: pay attention to how recovery feels, not only to what the numbers say, and support the work with food.

The mind matters as much as the body
Training after 40 is rarely only about physiology. Many women are carrying careers, family, caregiving and changing bodies at the same time. The reasons to train often change too. In a 2026 qualitative study of older athletes, sport was described as a meaningful part of identity. People stayed engaged through intrinsic motivation, a love of the sport that fit alongside the rest of their lives, and the freedom to take part on their own terms. Coaches who supported that sense of autonomy played a key role (Palma et al., 2026). The athletes in that study were older than 40 on average, but the message carries well: training that fits your life and your reasons is the training you keep doing.

How we coach women after 40 at ANC
We start with what you can realistically fit around your life. A plan that looks perfect on paper but ignores your work, family and sleep will not hold up for long. The research above found that the women who kept training more held on to more of their fitness, and that only happens when training fits your life.
We look at your whole stress bucket. Training load is only one part of it. Work stress, poor sleep, travel, caregiving and the changes of perimenopause and menopause all draw from the same place. We plan total load with all of that in view, and we adjust when life adds weight.
We keep strength two times a week, built around your experience and equipment, because it supports economy, durability and long term health.
We set your training intensities from Critical Power on the bike and Critical Speed on the run, along with pVO2 Max for the bike and sVO2 Max for the run. Because fitness changes as training changes, we retest regularly and update your numbers so the work always matches the athlete you are now.
And we listen. How you feel, how you sleep and why you train are part of the data. Every woman's experience of this stage is different, so there is no single formula. There is a plan built for you.
What makes ANC coaching different
Every ANC coach is experienced, educated and professional, and every one of us coaches from the same system and philosophy. That system is built on how stress and load add up across your whole life, not just your training. Nothing is generic. Your plan draws on everything in our coaching canon, shaped to you.
We read heart rate together with power, pace and how a session felt. Heart rate shows what the work cost you. Power and pace show what you did. How it felt fills in the rest. Using them side by side, and retesting as your fitness changes, keeps your training matched to the athlete you are now.
We coach the mind as well as the body. Motivation, confidence and why you train shape how well a plan holds up, so they are part of the coaching from day one.
And we coach every level, from women training for their first race to those chasing a podium.
If you would like a plan built around your life, your goals and the athlete you are now, you can learn more about coaching at angelanaethcoaching.com/pages/coaching.
References
Beattie K, Kenny IC, Lyons M, Carson BP. The effect of strength training on performance in endurance athletes. Sports Med. 2014;44(6). doi:10.1007/s40279-014-0157-y. PMID: 24532151.
Borges NR, Reaburn PR, Doering TM, Argus CK, Driller MW. Age-related changes in physical and perceptual markers of recovery following high-intensity interval cycle exercise. Exp Aging Res. 2018;44(4). doi:10.1080/0361073X.2018.1477361. PMID: 29843564.
Doering TM, Jenkins DG, Reaburn PR, Borges NR, Hohmann E, Phillips SM. Lower integrated muscle protein synthesis in masters compared with younger athletes. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2016;48(8). doi:10.1249/MSS.0000000000000935. PMID: 27433963.
Isenmann E, Geisler S, Havers T, Siegert F, Hemke F, Held S. It's never too late: the impact of resistance training on strength and body composition in females across the lifespan. A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Sci Med Sport. 2026;29(10). doi:10.1016/j.jsams.2026.03.002. PMID: 41963141.
McNulty KL, Olenick AA, Moore S, Cowley E. Invisibility of female participants in midlife and beyond in sport and exercise science research: a call to action. Br J Sports Med. 2024;58. doi:10.1136/bjsports-2023-107165. PMID: 38320852.
Morton RW, Murphy KT, McKellar SR, et al. A systematic review, meta-analysis and meta-regression of the effect of protein supplementation on resistance training-induced gains in muscle mass and strength in healthy adults. Br J Sports Med. 2018;52(6). doi:10.1136/bjsports-2017-097608. PMID: 28698222.
Palma BP, Collet C, Peixoto EM, Reverdito RS, Galatti LR. Being able to engage in sports on one's own terms: positive development in sport for older adults. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2026;23(5):548. doi:10.3390/ijerph23050548. PMID: 42196641.
Vangsgaard D, Noumi M, Hayden KA, Doyle-Baker PK. Effects of aging on determinants of endurance performance in women masters athletes: a scoping review. Healthcare (Basel). 2026;14(8):1080. doi:10.3390/healthcare14081080. PMID: 42072980.
Want this built into your training? See how Angela Naeth Coaching coaches women over 40, or book a free consult.
